Pit Bull ordinance still being debated

Fernando Castro with The Meteor

Discussion of whether or not all pit bulls pose a hazard to the community remains in dispute in City Council.

The Council tabled action on June 9 on possibly changing or rescinding the ordinance that strongly restricts ownership of a dog that goes under the classification of a pit bull. Breeds include American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier and Staffordshire Bull Terrier.

The ordinance states that other cities and municipalities have determined that pit bulls are very dangerous to humans and other animals. These places have enacted their own legislation on pit bull restrictions.

Madisonville's current ordinance prohibits newcomers from owning a pit bull dog. Residents who had these dogs before the ordinance was passed in February have to adhere to several provisions, including permits, signs, muzzles and other requirements.

Opponents of the ordinance believe a broad vicious dog ordinance would serve the same purpose. Mayor Don “Sonny” Dean also thinks that some owners of pit bulls are unnecessarily bearing some costs.

“I think we have citizens with pit bulls that are not a problem,” said Dean. “And if they're not a problem, then we shouldn't have them spending money building pens and such.”

Another solution brought up at the meeting was the city's leash law, which has not been strictly enforced.

“If the leash law were pursued, then we might not have another problem,” said council member Donnie Myrick.

With the issue tabled for now, the pit bull ordinance remains in effect. The penalty for violating the ordinance is $50 for each day the provisions are not followed.